Mars Market addresses
Three published addresses for the same market. Copy rather than retype, and check the signature once you are through.
Address 1
marsautkudspgk6j23cxdtrk36ae4fpis2eoe7izu5y2rsksvmfji2ad.onion
Address 2
marshjhtog245vzjzcicnmv2ci6yljibvdm4pngq5kmkfvcutppboxad.onion
Address 3
marsiujka6lrsaqpnxiwvknthhzsrlmq77mnl2fi62guc4lwxif65syd.onion
This list is published, not monitored. An address that opens is not an address that is genuine, and the check that settles it takes under a minute.
Reference › Procedures
Opening a dispute
Most of the outcome is decided by what you submit in the first message, and most people submit the wrong thing.
- What this step is
- Asking the platform to arbitrate a contested order and sign the release accordingly.
- How to prepare
- The order reference, the dates, and the message thread. Collected before you open, not after.
- What you will see
- A form, then a wait, then questions from an arbitrator who has read the record rather than your summary of it.
- How it works
- The platform holds the third key. When a dispute opens the contract freezes and the panel signs alongside whichever side it rules for, which is why a ruling actually moves money.
- How long it takes
- First response in hours. Most cases closed inside a working week. Longer when one side answers slowly.
- What you will experience
- A process that feels bureaucratic and impersonal, because it is matching a claim against a record rather than assessing who is more sympathetic.
- What can go wrong
- Filing early, submitting a narrative instead of a record, or arguing inside the ticket. All self inflicted and all common.
- Benefits and limits
- A binding outcome on a contested order. Nothing about anything paid outside escrow, which has no process at all.
What to attach
- Order reference and dates first. Not background, not context. The panel is matching your claim against a record.
- The message thread, unedited. Selective quoting reads as selective quoting and damages a case that would otherwise have won.
- Whatever delivery evidence exists, in the form you actually have rather than a description of it.
- One specific outcome. Full refund, partial, reship. A complaint with no remedy invites somebody else to choose one.
- Nothing else. Volume is not persuasive. A tight submission gets read properly and a long one gets skimmed.
What loses a winnable case
| Mistake | Why it costs you |
|---|---|
| Filing before the window closed | Usually dismissed, and the dismissal is visible on the resubmission |
| Arguing in the ticket | The panel is not an audience for the disagreement, and argument dilutes the evidence beside it |
| Threatening feedback | Visible to the arbitrator, reads as pressure, moves the case against you |
| Going silent mid process | Silence is weighed, and it is weighed against whoever went quiet |
| Filing several at once | A pattern of unsuccessful filings is visible and is taken into account |
Not automaticOutcomes go both ways. The system works because filing has a cost, and a buyer with a tight factual submission after a closed window is in a strong position regardless of which side they are on.
The lever you actually control
Answering promptly. Not filing forcefully, not writing at length, not escalating. Cases that run long almost always run long because one side is slow, and the side that is slow is the side that loses the benefit of the doubt.